Hi Wendy and Hans, I found an error about section 4.4.2 in ALTO interop document [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-roome-alto-interop-ietf93-01]. Section 4.4.2 indicates there is no costs in response but appendix A.2. defines a 'routingcost' cost from *private* to *private*.
Did I misunderstand this. I made a record about this and we may update in next submitting if my understanding is right. @Wendy your server does return a cost (ipv4:10.0.1.0 -- > ipv4:10.0.1.1 ). http://alto.benocs.berlin:8000/directory does not return any cost. ------------------------------------------------- 4.4.2. ECS Test 2 This test determines the costs between endpoints in the "default" PID: Query: sources: ipv4:10.0.1.0 ("private") ipv6:::2 ("default") destinations: ipv4:10.0.1.1 ("private") ipv6:::1:2 ("default") Figure 15: ECS Test 2 Since no costs are defined between those PIDs the server MUST return an ECS response containing no costs. ------------------------------------------------ A.2<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-roome-alto-interop-ietf93-01#appendix-A.2>. Default "routingcost" Cost Map "cost-map": { "default": { "mine": 60.0, "mine1": 63.0, "mine2": 64.0, "mine1a": 65.0, "mine3": 65.0 }, "linklocal": { "linklocal": 0.0 }, "loopback": { "loopback": 0.0 }, "mine": { "mine": 0.0, "mine1": 3.0, "mine2": 4.0, "mine1a": 5.0, "mine3": 5.0, "peer1": 20.0, "peer2": 25.0, "tran1": 35.0, "tran2": 45.0, "default": 60.0 }, "mine1": { "mine": 3.0, "mine1": 0.0, "mine2": 6.5, "mine1a": 2.0, "mine3": 8.0, "peer1": 23.0, "peer2": 28.0, "tran1": 38.0, "tran2": 48.0, "default": 63.0 }, "mine1a": { "mine": 5.0, "mine1": 2.0, "mine2": 4.5, "mine1a": 0.0, "mine3": 10.0, "peer1": 25.0, "peer2": 30.0, "tran1": 40.0, "tran2": 50.0, "default": 65.0 }, "mine2": { "mine": 4.0, "mine1": 7.0, "mine2": 0.0, "mine1a": 9.0, "mine3": 9.0, "peer1": 24.0, "peer2": 29.0, "tran1": 39.0, "tran2": 49.0, "default": 64.0 }, "mine3": { "mine": 5.0, "mine1": 8.0, "mine2": 9.0, "mine1a": 10.0, "mine3": 0.0, "peer1": 25.0, "peer2": 30.0, "tran1": 40.0, "tran2": 50.0, "default": 65.0 }, "peer1": { "mine": 20.0, "mine1": 23.0, "mine2": 24.0, "mine1a": 25.0, "mine3": 25.0, "peer1": 0.0 }, "peer2": { "mine": 25.0, "mine1": 28.0, "mine2": 29.0, "mine1a": 30.0, "mine3": 30.0, "peer2": 0.0 }, "private": { "private": 0.0 }, BR G.Robert Chen From: alto [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ChenGuohai Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 6:12 PM To: Roome Wendy; Seidel Hans Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [alto] On-line interop-93 test client ________________________________ Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:04:51 -0400 Subject: Re: [alto] On-line interop-93 test client From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> CC: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Hans, I have revised the interop document. See attached. NOTE: Please check the link costs in Figures 5 & 10. I did *not* update them from the version you gave me last week. In particular I am sure that Figure 5 is out-of-date, since that uses your original link costs. I dropped the ECS tests for omitted source & destination. Those were always flakey, because the client address is unpredictable. Let me know if you think those are worth putting back in. - Wendy Roome From: Hans Seidel <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thu, September 3, 2015 at 09:41 To: Wendy Roome <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, ChenGuohai <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [alto] On-line interop-93 test client Wendy Server is updated and running. Please check if the results are now as expected. Thanks Hans On 02.09.2015 19:43, Wendy Roome wrote: Hans, Okay. Let me know when you have revised your server. - Wendy From: Hans Seidel <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wed, September 2, 2015 at 12:08 To: Wendy Roome <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, ChenGuohai <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [alto] On-line interop-93 test client Wendy, Thank you. No I got it. Yes. At the moment we rank the costs for each source separately. This also concerns endpoint cost service which I have to fix accordingly as well. Hans
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
