Hi Wendy and Hans,
I found an error about section 4.4.2 in ALTO interop document
[http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-roome-alto-interop-ietf93-01].
Section 4.4.2 indicates there is no costs in response but appendix
A.2. defines a 'routingcost' cost from *private* to *private*.
Did I misunderstand this. I made a record about this and we may update
in next submitting if my understanding is right.
@Wendy your server does return a cost (ipv4:10.0.1.0 -- > ipv4:10.0.1.1 ).
http://alto.benocs.berlin:8000/directory does not return any cost.
-------------------------------------------------
4.4.2. ECS Test 2
This test determines the costs between endpoints in the "default"
PID:
Query:
sources:
ipv4:10.0.1.0 ("private")
ipv6:::2 ("default")
destinations:
ipv4:10.0.1.1 ("private")
ipv6:::1:2 ("default")
Figure 15: ECS Test 2
Since no costs are defined between those PIDs the server MUST return
an ECS response containing no costs.
------------------------------------------------
*A.2*<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-roome-alto-interop-ietf93-01#appendix-A.2>*.Default
"routingcost" Cost Map*
"cost-map": {
"default": {
"mine": 60.0,"mine1": 63.0,"mine2": 64.0,"mine1a": 65.0,
"mine3": 65.0 },
"linklocal": {
"linklocal": 0.0 },
"loopback": {
"loopback": 0.0 },
"mine": {
"mine": 0.0,"mine1": 3.0,"mine2": 4.0,"mine1a": 5.0,
"mine3": 5.0,"peer1": 20.0,"peer2": 25.0,"tran1": 35.0,
"tran2": 45.0,"default": 60.0 },
"mine1": {
"mine": 3.0,"mine1": 0.0,"mine2": 6.5,"mine1a": 2.0,
"mine3": 8.0,"peer1": 23.0,"peer2": 28.0,"tran1": 38.0,
"tran2": 48.0,"default": 63.0 },
"mine1a": {
"mine": 5.0,"mine1": 2.0,"mine2": 4.5,"mine1a": 0.0,
"mine3": 10.0,"peer1": 25.0,"peer2": 30.0,"tran1": 40.0,
"tran2": 50.0,"default": 65.0 },
"mine2": {
"mine": 4.0,"mine1": 7.0,"mine2": 0.0,"mine1a": 9.0,
"mine3": 9.0,"peer1": 24.0,"peer2": 29.0,"tran1": 39.0,
"tran2": 49.0,"default": 64.0 },
"mine3": {
"mine": 5.0,"mine1": 8.0,"mine2": 9.0,"mine1a": 10.0,
"mine3": 0.0,"peer1": 25.0,"peer2": 30.0,"tran1": 40.0,
"tran2": 50.0,"default": 65.0 },
"peer1": {
"mine": 20.0,"mine1": 23.0,"mine2": 24.0,"mine1a": 25.0,
"mine3": 25.0,"peer1": 0.0
},
"peer2": {
"mine": 25.0,"mine1": 28.0,"mine2": 29.0,"mine1a": 30.0,
"mine3": 30.0,"peer2": 0.0 },
"private": {
"private": 0.0 },
BR
G.RobertChen
*From:*alto [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *ChenGuohai
*Sent:* Thursday, September 17, 2015 6:12 PM
*To:* Roome Wendy; Seidel Hans
*Cc:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [alto] On-line interop-93 test client
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:04:51 -0400
Subject: Re: [alto] On-line interop-93 test client
From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
CC: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Hans,
I have revised the interop document. See attached.
NOTE: Please check the link costs in Figures 5 & 10. I did *not*
update them from the version you gave me last week. In particular I am
sure that Figure 5 is out-of-date, since that uses your original link
costs.
I dropped the ECS tests for omitted source & destination. Those were
always flakey, because the client address is unpredictable. Let me
know if you think those are worth putting back in.
- Wendy Roome
*From: *Hans Seidel <<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]>
*Date: *Thu, September 3, 2015 at 09:41
*To: *Wendy Roome
<<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]>
*Cc: *"<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]"
<<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]>, ChenGuohai
<<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]>
*Subject: *Re: [alto] On-line interop-93 test client
Wendy
Server is updated and running. Please check if the results are now as
expected.
Thanks
Hans
On 02.09.2015 19:43, Wendy Roome wrote:
Hans,
Okay. Let me know when you have revised your server.
- Wendy
*From: *Hans Seidel <<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]>
*Date: *Wed, September 2, 2015 at 12:08
*To: *Wendy Roome
<<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]>
*Cc: *"<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]"
<<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]>, ChenGuohai
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
*Subject: *Re: [alto] On-line interop-93 test client
Wendy,
Thank you. No I got it.
Yes. At the moment we rank the costs for each source separately.
This also concerns endpoint cost service which I have to fix
accordingly as well.
Hans
