Hi Wendy and Hans, Great to see so much progresses in ALTO interop. BRG.Robert Chen
> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 09:33:39 -0400 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [alto] On-line interop-93 test client > > Hans, > > Thanks, I will look that over. I certainly agree that the original network > & cost maps were not realistic, and I would be happy to switch to > something else. > > While I do, here is a question for the rest of you. Who is using my public > ALTO server and test client? Assuming we do switch to different maps, > instead of maintaining two versions, I would prefer to do a flag-day > cutover. Would anyone have a problem with that? Assuming suitable > warning, of course. > > - Wendy Roome > > On 08/28/2015, 05:15, "Hans Seidel" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >At the interop in Prague, Ingmar and I mentioned that cost values of the > >cost map in the current interop draft are not very realistic and we > >faced some problems feeding them into our server since we use real > >network data. > >I modified the current interop draft in such way that the cost map > >values are more realistic. To be as non-invasive as possible I left the > >network maps unmodified. Additionally, I added example network figures > >to the draft that > >can be used (and are used by us) to generate the default and alternate > >maps. > > > >We also updated our ALTO server accordingly: > >http://alto.benocs.berlin:8000/directory > > > >Find attached the modified version of the interop draft. > >Please have a look and send me some feedback. > > > >Cheers > >Hans > > > > > _______________________________________________ > alto mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
