>what are ppl more partial to using? ... This comes up here every once in a while and is basically a religious issue. The points you bring up, as well as being able to do subsets of an entire file system and portability, are all good reasons to use GNU tar. I won't use it here because it alters the access time, and the other benefits don't outweigh that, but that's just my own situation. >Marc G. Fournier John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... John R. Jackson
- Re: GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... Jon LaBadie
- Re: GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... John R. Jackson
- Re: GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... Greg Troxel
- Re: GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... Greg Troxel
- updated mtx script? Mike Cathey