On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, John R. Jackson wrote: > >what are ppl more partial to using? ... > > This comes up here every once in a while and is basically a religious > issue. > > The points you bring up, as well as being able to do subsets of an entire > file system and portability, are all good reasons to use GNU tar. > > I won't use it here because it alters the access time, and the other > benefits don't outweigh that, but that's just my own situation. Oh, definitely a good point there ... another good one is that incrementals don't work either, do they, with GNU-Tar?
- GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... John R. Jackson
- Re: GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... Jon LaBadie
- Re: GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... John R. Jackson
- Re: GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... Greg Troxel
- Re: GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: GNU-Tar vs dump/restore ... Greg Troxel
- updated mtx script? Mike Cathey
- Re: updated mtx script? Christopher McCrory