On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Mark Holm wrote:

> Keep reading. There are two more messages following this as thoughts
> developed. BTW, the message delay is now almost 24 hours as I wrote this one
> last night.
 
I see a 2nd one but not a 3rd.  The one from last night seems to have
been delayed between you and the list's server.  The delay I was
referring to is between delivery of a message to an address high
on the list and delivery of the same message to an address low on the
list.

> I used a tapetype defined in the FAQ-o-Matic by somebody. I looked at about
> 10, they were all similar and defined the tape as holding 25Gb.

Are you 100% positive you have the units right?  It looks like amanda
put 23 Mb on the tape, which suggests she may have thought you said 25 Mb.

-Mitch

Reply via email to