On 18/07/2011 11:52, Maciej Machulak wrote: > Hi all, > > On 18 July 2011 10:34, Łukasz Moreń <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I think there are some things that need to be improved before the release. >> Could you please suggest what Amber is currently missing what is required >> for the release or ideally try to fix it :)?. > > Yes, this would be great. We'll then use the feedback and improve > what's necessary. > >> With Maciej we will work on OAuth 2.0 module. From what I see should be >> done: >> >> - unify maven dependencies in oauth 2.0 module by specifying versions in >> <dependencyManagement> in the main pom > > Fully agree. > >> - change oauth 2.0 module version form 0.2-SNAPSHOT to 1.0-SNAPSHOT (used by >> the core pom) - is this change safe? > > Ah, yes. This should be probably changed. > > Anyway, lets look for some feedback and then we'll make the changes. > It'll be great if somebody more experienced could help with the Apache > process (ip, voting, etc.).
Do you mean that we'd be preparing a 1.0 release? Or are you referring to something else? p >> Cheers, >> Lukasz Moren >> > > Cheers, > Maciej >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
