On 18/07/2011 16:48, Raymond Feng wrote: > It's project by project. The only requirement is to have -incubating as part > of the version. > > In Amber case, if we reserve version 1.0 to match the final oAuth 2.0 spec, > we can start with 0.x-incubating, even 0.5-incubating.
That's a sensible suggestion. p > We should try to use maven release plugin to handle the maven release. > > Thanks, > Raymond > ________________________________________________________________ > Raymond Feng > [email protected] > Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org > Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com > Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com > ________________________________________________________________ > > On Jul 18, 2011, at 6:15 AM, Pid wrote: > >> On 18/07/2011 12:13, Łukasz Moreń wrote: >>> Yes, a 1.0 release. >> >> I think we should aim lower & start with a 0.1. >> >> This will give us the chance to work towards a declaration that an >> eventual 1.0 is stable and bug-free. We need to be public and get user >> feedback to achieve that IMHO. >> >> I think most incubator projects start with a 0.1 but that's probably >> convention. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> >> p >> >> >> >>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Pid <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On 18/07/2011 11:52, Maciej Machulak wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> On 18 July 2011 10:34, Łukasz Moreń <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I think there are some things that need to be improved before the >>>> release. >>>>>> Could you please suggest what Amber is currently missing what is >>>> required >>>>>> for the release or ideally try to fix it :)?. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, this would be great. We'll then use the feedback and improve >>>>> what's necessary. >>>>> >>>>>> With Maciej we will work on OAuth 2.0 module. From what I see should be >>>>>> done: >>>>>> >>>>>> - unify maven dependencies in oauth 2.0 module by specifying versions in >>>>>> <dependencyManagement> in the main pom >>>>> >>>>> Fully agree. >>>>> >>>>>> - change oauth 2.0 module version form 0.2-SNAPSHOT to 1.0-SNAPSHOT >>>> (used by >>>>>> the core pom) - is this change safe? >>>>> >>>>> Ah, yes. This should be probably changed. >>>>> >>>>> Anyway, lets look for some feedback and then we'll make the changes. >>>>> It'll be great if somebody more experienced could help with the Apache >>>>> process (ip, voting, etc.). >>>> >>>> Do you mean that we'd be preparing a 1.0 release? Or are you referring >>>> to something else? >>>> >>>> >>>> p >>>> >>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Lukasz Moren >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Maciej >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
