It's project by project. The only requirement is to have -incubating as part of the version.
In Amber case, if we reserve version 1.0 to match the final oAuth 2.0 spec, we can start with 0.x-incubating, even 0.5-incubating. We should try to use maven release plugin to handle the maven release. Thanks, Raymond ________________________________________________________________ Raymond Feng [email protected] Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com ________________________________________________________________ On Jul 18, 2011, at 6:15 AM, Pid wrote: > On 18/07/2011 12:13, Łukasz Moreń wrote: >> Yes, a 1.0 release. > > I think we should aim lower & start with a 0.1. > > This will give us the chance to work towards a declaration that an > eventual 1.0 is stable and bug-free. We need to be public and get user > feedback to achieve that IMHO. > > I think most incubator projects start with a 0.1 but that's probably > convention. > > Thoughts? > > > p > > > >> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Pid <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 18/07/2011 11:52, Maciej Machulak wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> On 18 July 2011 10:34, Łukasz Moreń <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I think there are some things that need to be improved before the >>> release. >>>>> Could you please suggest what Amber is currently missing what is >>> required >>>>> for the release or ideally try to fix it :)?. >>>> >>>> Yes, this would be great. We'll then use the feedback and improve >>>> what's necessary. >>>> >>>>> With Maciej we will work on OAuth 2.0 module. From what I see should be >>>>> done: >>>>> >>>>> - unify maven dependencies in oauth 2.0 module by specifying versions in >>>>> <dependencyManagement> in the main pom >>>> >>>> Fully agree. >>>> >>>>> - change oauth 2.0 module version form 0.2-SNAPSHOT to 1.0-SNAPSHOT >>> (used by >>>>> the core pom) - is this change safe? >>>> >>>> Ah, yes. This should be probably changed. >>>> >>>> Anyway, lets look for some feedback and then we'll make the changes. >>>> It'll be great if somebody more experienced could help with the Apache >>>> process (ip, voting, etc.). >>> >>> Do you mean that we'd be preparing a 1.0 release? Or are you referring >>> to something else? >>> >>> >>> p >>> >>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Lukasz Moren >>>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Maciej >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > >
