Hi all, We are still waiting for the IP grant from the university, although I am sure it will be sorted out. I know it may be annoying, but we can just keep waiting.
There is growing interest in Amber development so to not block that, maybe we could: 1. make a new branch from the current trunk (we would have to do that anyway) - stable draft-10 implementation. 2. continue adding new features to the trunk - there is already few patches waiting for commit on jira. Please let me know what do you think? Cheers, Lukasz Moren On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Pid <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19/07/2011 07:51, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > > It would be nice if we could solve the IP clearance of the Leelo code > > as soon as possible [1]. We need a signed software grant [2] from > > Newcastle University. Then we need to update the license headers in > > all source files according to [3], that means the copyright notice > > should be moved to the NOTICE file. > > Lukasz, Maciej this is in your hands I think. Can you keep us posted? > > I'm happy to do the tidy up & some of the dull stuff thereafter. > > > p > > > Kind Regards, > > Stefan > > > > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/amber-leeloo.html > > [2] http://apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt > > [3] http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Łukasz Moreń <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I think there are some things that need to be improved before the > release. > >> Could you please suggest what Amber is currently missing what is > required > >> for the release or ideally try to fix it :)?. > >> With Maciej we will work on OAuth 2.0 module. From what I see should be > >> done: > >> > >> - unify maven dependencies in oauth 2.0 module by specifying versions in > >> <dependencyManagement> in the main pom > >> - change oauth 2.0 module version form 0.2-SNAPSHOT to 1.0-SNAPSHOT > (used by > >> the core pom) - is this change safe? > >> > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Lukasz Moren > >> > >
