Hi, comments inline:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Antonio Sanso <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Lukasz, > > just my 2 cents here. > > On Oct 25, 2011, at 3:42 AM, Łukasz Moreń wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > We are still waiting for the IP grant from the university, although I am > > sure it will be sorted out. > > I know it may be annoying, but we can just keep waiting. > > > > There is growing interest in Amber development so to not block that, > maybe > > we could: > > > > 1. make a new branch from the current trunk (we would have to do that > > anyway) - stable draft-10 implementation. > > Wouldn't be enough doing a tag for it (rather than a branch)? I mean do you > expect that anybody would use version 10 of oauth2.0? > If not, I do not personally see any real benefit from the branch. > We could do tag as well, however IMHO creating branch is not big harm and we have opportunity to commit possible bug fixes for draft-10. Many big OAuth 2.0 providers, like Facebook or Google, implements this draft and probably it will not change quickly, so would be good to keep Amber draft-10 implementation reliable. > > > 2. continue adding new features to the trunk - there is already few > patches > > waiting for commit on jira. > > > > Please let me know what do you think? > > > > Cheers, > > Lukasz Moren > > Regards > > Antonio > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Pid <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 19/07/2011 07:51, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > >>> It would be nice if we could solve the IP clearance of the Leelo code > >>> as soon as possible [1]. We need a signed software grant [2] from > >>> Newcastle University. Then we need to update the license headers in > >>> all source files according to [3], that means the copyright notice > >>> should be moved to the NOTICE file. > >> > >> Lukasz, Maciej this is in your hands I think. Can you keep us posted? > >> > >> I'm happy to do the tidy up & some of the dull stuff thereafter. > >> > >> > >> p > >> > >>> Kind Regards, > >>> Stefan > >>> > >>> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/amber-leeloo.html > >>> [2] http://apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt > >>> [3] http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Łukasz Moreń <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> I think there are some things that need to be improved before the > >> release. > >>>> Could you please suggest what Amber is currently missing what is > >> required > >>>> for the release or ideally try to fix it :)?. > >>>> With Maciej we will work on OAuth 2.0 module. From what I see should > be > >>>> done: > >>>> > >>>> - unify maven dependencies in oauth 2.0 module by specifying versions > in > >>>> <dependencyManagement> in the main pom > >>>> - change oauth 2.0 module version form 0.2-SNAPSHOT to 1.0-SNAPSHOT > >> (used by > >>>> the core pom) - is this change safe? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Lukasz Moren > >>>> > >> > >> > >
