Hello Dennis

With 7684 bars (which is as much as I have) I get 4.5 milliseconds. Check the 
link for the screen dump.

http://img686.imageshack.us/img686/5295/rsispeed.png

If you send me 15000 or more bars I can send you the results.

Regards,
Paul

--- In [email protected], Dennis Brown <se...@...> wrote:
>
> Paul,
> 
> Thank you for the information.  However, it is meaningless without knowing 
> the number of bars processed.  7000 bars is the minimum number I process in 
> realtime and I would like to bump that up to 15000, speed permitting.  All my 
> continuous functions are variable period and I only have one RT chart open.  
> 2.8 GHz virtual processor (2 of 4 cores assigned to the virtual machine).  I 
> would have to replace my custom built functions with your standard ones, so I 
> would need to compare results between the two.  I don't think it is possible 
> to test without an evaluation period.
> 
> BR,
> Dennis
> 
> 
> On Jun 25, 2010, at 11:41 PM, WiseStockTrader wrote:
> 
> > Hello Dennis
> > 
> > All the indicator formulas execute within about 2 - 4 milliseconds which is 
> > on average about 0.003 seconds. The only exceptions to this are the the 
> > Hilbert Oscillator (7 milliseconds), Sine Wave (38 milliseconds) and 
> > automatic support (90 milliseconds). 
> > 
> > Some functions are a little slower than the native Amibroker versions 
> > because they verify the data supplied to them and  because they are 
> > variable period functions so the same optimizations do not apply but I 
> > don't think you will ever notice the difference unless you have a hundred 
> > realtime charts open.
> > 
> > All tests conducted on 2.4ghz Core 2 processor.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Paul
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], Dennis Brown <see3d@> wrote:
> >> 
> >> Hello,
> >> 
> >> I agree with the sentiment below.  While it is not unreasonable for a 
> >> specialized tool to cost more than the base product (based on amortizing 
> >> the costs over a smaller user base), there should be a way to test its 
> >> value.  In my case, I have written many overlapping functions to these in 
> >> AFL.  Speed is my issue.  I would love to test the functionality against 
> >> my own versions for speed.  I am trying to trade realtime, and I have 2 
> >> second compute delays.  Speeding up my routines is high on my wish list.  
> >> It would take some time and effort on my part just to evaluate its 
> >> usefulness as integrated into my routines.  I have already run down the 
> >> route of purchasing a toolbox that could not be returned, only to discover 
> >> that it was useless to me after a lot of effort.  Insult added to injury 
> >> that I would not like to repeat.  However, I am interested in finding out 
> >> if it can be of value to me.
> >> 
> >> Best regards,
> >> Dennis
> >> 
> >> On Jun 25, 2010, at 10:58 AM, cjdudek wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Yeah, this looks fairly useful and I don't mind paying for somebody 
> >>> else's code, but not without a free trial like AmiBroker offered, 
> >>> especially considering your "no refund" policy.  It's really hard to look 
> >>> at documentation to decide whether or not it's worth $300.  I looked at 
> >>> plenty of AmiBroker alternatives that looked good on their web sites but 
> >>> didn't offer the functionality of AmiBroker.  I think a product like this 
> >>> might make AmiBroker 10% or 20% more useful, but not 100% more useful, so 
> >>> the price does not seem to reflect the value.  If I had a 30-day or even 
> >>> 10-day free trial I might change my mind.
> >>> 
> >>> --- In [email protected], ram vel <rvlv@> wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>> Hi wisestocktrader
> >>>> Thanks for your info with indepth idea of your toolset.
> >>>> CAN YOU PLEASE GIVE US LINK FOR HAVING A TRIAL OF YOUR TOOLBOX,PLEASE
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------
> > 
> > **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
> > This group is for the discussion between users only.
> > This is *NOT* technical support channel.
> > 
> > TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to 
> > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> > 
> > TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> > http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
> > (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
> > 
> > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> >
>


Reply via email to