Rob Thank you for posting this. (Library John Ehler) I have a general question.
I tried to translate code from other platforms, and did not succeed. I note that you placed the greater part of the code in a FOR loop. This has me confused. I thought AmiBroker created arrays automatically, and that loops would not be required here. Why are the loops necessary? Hopefully someone can enlighten me Rick --- In [email protected], "Rob" <sidharth...@...> wrote: > > Posted the Sine Wave... just search for John Ehler > > --- In [email protected], "Rob" <sidhartha70@> wrote: > > > > I'll post them in the AFL library... > > > > --- In [email protected], "Anthony Faragasso" <ajf1111@> wrote: > > > > > > I would like a copy also...if possible.. > > > > > > Thank you > > > Anthony > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Rick Osborn > > > To: [email protected] > > > Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2010 11:42 AM > > > Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: New 3rd party toolset for AmiBroker > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rob > > > I would like a copy. > > > I have been trying to translate EasyLanguage and other code but I just > > > don't understand the math and my attempts just don't look right. > > > > > > > > > Best Regards > > > Rick Osborn > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > From: Rob <sidhartha70@> > > > To: [email protected] > > > Sent: Sat, June 26, 2010 4:20:10 AM > > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: New 3rd party toolset for AmiBroker > > > > > > > > > I have the hilbert oscillator & sine wave already coded in AFL if > > > anyone wants them... > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "WiseStockTrader" <wisestocktrader@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello Dennis > > > > > > > > All the indicator formulas execute within about 2 - 4 milliseconds > > > which is on average about 0.003 seconds. The only exceptions to this are > > > the the Hilbert Oscillator (7 milliseconds), Sine Wave (38 milliseconds) > > > and automatic support (90 milliseconds). > > > > > > > > Some functions are a little slower than the native Amibroker versions > > > because they verify the data supplied to them and because they are > > > variable period functions so the same optimizations do not apply but I > > > don't think you will ever notice the difference unless you have a hundred > > > realtime charts open. > > > > > > > > All tests conducted on 2.4ghz Core 2 processor. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Dennis Brown <see3d@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > I agree with the sentiment below. While it is not unreasonable for > > > a specialized tool to cost more than the base product (based on > > > amortizing the costs over a smaller user base), there should be a way to > > > test its value. In my case, I have written many overlapping functions to > > > these in AFL. Speed is my issue. I would love to test the functionality > > > against my own versions for speed. I am trying to trade realtime, and I > > > have 2 second compute delays. Speeding up my routines is high on my wish > > > list. It would take some time and effort on my part just to evaluate its > > > usefulness as integrated into my routines. I have already run down the > > > route of purchasing a toolbox that could not be returned, only to > > > discover that it was useless to me after a lot of effort. Insult added to > > > injury that I would not like to repeat. However, I am interested in > > > finding out if it can be of value to me. > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Dennis > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 25, 2010, at 10:58 AM, cjdudek wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, this looks fairly useful and I don't mind paying for > > > somebody else's code, but not without a free trial like AmiBroker > > > offered, especially considering your "no refund" policy. It's really hard > > > to look at documentation to decide whether or not it's worth $300. I > > > looked at plenty of AmiBroker alternatives that looked good on their web > > > sites but didn't offer the functionality of AmiBroker. I think a product > > > like this might make AmiBroker 10% or 20% more useful, but not 100% more > > > useful, so the price does not seem to reflect the value. If I had a > > > 30-day or even 10-day free trial I might change my mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], ram vel <rvlv@> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Hi wisestocktrader > > > > > >> Thanks for your info with indepth idea of your toolset. > > > > > >> CAN YOU PLEASE GIVE US LINK FOR HAVING A TRIAL OF YOUR > > > TOOLBOX,PLEASE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
