Hello, Rob, Can I have it, please?
Best regards, vgakkhar > ________________________________ > From: Rob <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Sat, June 26, 2010 4:20:10 AM > Subject: [amibroker] Re: New 3rd party toolset for AmiBroker > >I have the hilbert oscillator & sine wave already coded in AFL if anyone wants >them... > > --- In [email protected], "WiseStockTrader" <wisestocktra...@...> > wrote: >> >> Hello Dennis >> >> All the indicator formulas execute within about 2 - 4 milliseconds which is >> on average about 0.003 seconds. The only exceptions to this are the the >> Hilbert Oscillator (7 milliseconds), Sine Wave (38 milliseconds) and >> automatic support (90 milliseconds). >> >> Some functions are a little slower than the native Amibroker versions >> because they verify the data supplied to them and because they are variable >> period functions so the same optimizations do not apply but I don't think >> you will ever notice the difference unless you have a hundred realtime >> charts open. >> >> All tests conducted on 2.4ghz Core 2 processor. >> >> Regards, >> Paul >> >> --- In [email protected], Dennis Brown <see3d@> wrote: >> > >> > Hello, >> > >> > I agree with the sentiment below. While it is not unreasonable for a >> > specialized tool to cost more than the base product (based on amortizing >> > the costs over a smaller user base), there should be a way to test its >> > value. In my case, I have written many overlapping functions to these in >> > AFL. Speed is my issue. I would love to test the functionality against >> > my own versions for speed. I am trying to trade realtime, and I have 2 >> > second compute delays. Speeding up my routines is high on my wish list. >> > It would take some time and effort on my part just to evaluate its >> > usefulness as integrated into my routines. I have already run down the >> > route of purchasing a toolbox that could not be returned, only to discover >> > that it was useless to me after a lot of effort. Insult added to injury >> > that I would not like to repeat. However, I am interested in finding out >> > if it can be of value to me. >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Dennis >> > >> > On Jun 25, 2010, at 10:58 AM, cjdudek wrote: >> > >> > > Yeah, this looks fairly useful and I don't mind paying for somebody >> > > else's code, but not without a free trial like AmiBroker offered, >> > > especially considering your "no refund" policy. It's really hard to >> > > look at documentation to decide whether or not it's worth $300. I >> > > looked at plenty of AmiBroker alternatives that looked good on their web >> > > sites but didn't offer the functionality of AmiBroker. I think a >> > > product like this might make AmiBroker 10% or 20% more useful, but not >> > > 100% more useful, so the price does not seem to reflect the value. If I >> > > had a 30-day or even 10-day free trial I might change my mind. >> > > >> > > --- In [email protected], ram vel <rvlv@> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> Hi wisestocktrader >> > >> Thanks for your info with indepth idea of your toolset. >> > >> CAN YOU PLEASE GIVE US LINK FOR HAVING A TRIAL OF YOUR TOOLBOX,PLEASE >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > ------------------------------------ **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ **** This group is for the discussion between users only. This is *NOT* technical support channel. TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/ (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered) For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG: http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
