I would like a copy also...if possible.. Thank you Anthony
----- Original Message ----- From: Rick Osborn To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2010 11:42 AM Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: New 3rd party toolset for AmiBroker Rob I would like a copy. I have been trying to translate EasyLanguage and other code but I just don't understand the math and my attempts just don't look right. Best Regards Rick Osborn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From: Rob <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sat, June 26, 2010 4:20:10 AM Subject: [amibroker] Re: New 3rd party toolset for AmiBroker I have the hilbert oscillator & sine wave already coded in AFL if anyone wants them... --- In [email protected], "WiseStockTrader" <wisestocktra...@...> wrote: > > Hello Dennis > > All the indicator formulas execute within about 2 - 4 milliseconds which is on average about 0.003 seconds. The only exceptions to this are the the Hilbert Oscillator (7 milliseconds), Sine Wave (38 milliseconds) and automatic support (90 milliseconds). > > Some functions are a little slower than the native Amibroker versions because they verify the data supplied to them and because they are variable period functions so the same optimizations do not apply but I don't think you will ever notice the difference unless you have a hundred realtime charts open. > > All tests conducted on 2.4ghz Core 2 processor. > > Regards, > Paul > > --- In [email protected], Dennis Brown <see3d@> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I agree with the sentiment below. While it is not unreasonable for a specialized tool to cost more than the base product (based on amortizing the costs over a smaller user base), there should be a way to test its value. In my case, I have written many overlapping functions to these in AFL. Speed is my issue. I would love to test the functionality against my own versions for speed. I am trying to trade realtime, and I have 2 second compute delays. Speeding up my routines is high on my wish list. It would take some time and effort on my part just to evaluate its usefulness as integrated into my routines. I have already run down the route of purchasing a toolbox that could not be returned, only to discover that it was useless to me after a lot of effort. Insult added to injury that I would not like to repeat. However, I am interested in finding out if it can be of value to me. > > > > Best regards, > > Dennis > > > > On Jun 25, 2010, at 10:58 AM, cjdudek wrote: > > > > > Yeah, this looks fairly useful and I don't mind paying for somebody else's code, but not without a free trial like AmiBroker offered, especially considering your "no refund" policy. It's really hard to look at documentation to decide whether or not it's worth $300. I looked at plenty of AmiBroker alternatives that looked good on their web sites but didn't offer the functionality of AmiBroker. I think a product like this might make AmiBroker 10% or 20% more useful, but not 100% more useful, so the price does not seem to reflect the value. If I had a 30-day or even 10-day free trial I might change my mind. > > > > > > --- In [email protected], ram vel <rvlv@> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi wisestocktrader > > >> Thanks for your info with indepth idea of your toolset. > > >> CAN YOU PLEASE GIVE US LINK FOR HAVING A TRIAL OF YOUR TOOLBOX,PLEASE > > > > > > > > >
