On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 02:22 +0000, Robin Cloutman wrote: > Ian Kumlien wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 16:55 +0000, Robin Cloutman wrote: > > > >>[snip] > >> > >>Er!!!? Wtf was all that, somthing went wrong with your post there, want > >>to try again, I can't work out what it's trying to say - looks like some > >>unicode crap, try sending a real plain text email or something... > > > > Quoted printable. > > Mozilla should be able to deal with that at any rate ;-) Yep, most mailers should, but for some reason i haven't seen any mailer working with it for a while... but then i only looked at it quickly and it seemed to be qp.
> > Anyways, mirc and other brain dead irc client implementations uses all > > ports *including* <1024 that is defined as reserved for services. Thus, > > whatever it is that trues to dcc to you sucks. > > *Except* that amirc doesn't care what port it's using, or even if it's a > bad IP - so long as it's got the right format amirc will sit there like > a lemon trying to connect! I really really really doubt it, test it to prove me wrong =). > Robin -- Ian Kumlien <pomac () vapor ! com> -- http://pomac.netswarm.net -- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis -- -- File: signature.asc -- Desc: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCQX0U7F3Euyc51N8RAmiLAJ9ivVEFbuPyDrYVA4jt8YmwuM9tIgCgrL8X FuVHTetiujuECGcZbRdrG20= =05OX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
