On Wednesday 16 November 2005 20:12, Youness Alaoui wrote: > Ok, here's the thing.. I think 0.95 is really great and people will like > it ALOT (even with the glitches) especially those who don't know what a > CVS is... > I suggest we skip the 0.95RC1 release, we go directly to 0.95, we "adapt" > the webcam wizard in order for it to work (I think it was already done.. > who can confirm?) and we make sure the wizard is run on the first "webcam > send".. also, make it available in the Tools menu. > We put up the new website, we change SF forum to the new forum, we make > great packages (klik, autopackage, win32, mac, rpm/deb/tgz/whatever-else) > and we release 0.95... we wait about a month or two, just the time needed > to fix all new bugs and all pending issues and we release 0.95.1 > What do you think ? I'm half half but I will on no. The 0.95 release has a lot of new changes and I dunno how much they are tested. Having an release candidate can bring in a wider audience, unless of course there are more cvs users than 0.94. We can then spend 2-3 weeks (a set period before release) fixing reported bugs and then just go straight to a stable release.
> I would like to request a vote, so everyone's opinions are kept correctly : > * I want to release 0.95 NOW : > Youness > > * No, we keep the way we had before, release 0.95RC1, then RC2, then ... > and 0.96 for next year... (hoping we finish what has been pending for > 0.95RC1) Karol Krizka > > > > If we're all ok (I'll leave a one week vote and we'll proceed with 0.95 > NOW if we get 75% votes or more), we'll do the release and start working > on new things (I think everyone here needs some motivation!!!). > I would also like to suggest (once OUR poll is done) we put up a poll in > the website with a link to a forum thread which would explain the two > options and ask users to vote on the website. > Also vote for this idea... > * I want user's opinions > Youness Karol Krizka > > * No, we'll take the vote from the developpers as being the ultimate > decision. > > > Thanks for reading, > KaKaRoTo > > On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 22:57:37 -0500, Jérôme Gagnon-Voyer > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I created the amsn mac forum and this is a total sucess. At first I > > had to answer manually to everybody but fast a community of users > > appeared to answer newbies questions. So now, I don't have time > > anymore for the forum (university), but when newbies appear, I just > > tell them to go to the forum and the "community" take care of them > > and they can look in the archives. So I agree with you, the SF-Forum > > is crappy, we should just redirect it to Recording Ground. > > > > Le 05-11-16 à 15:30, Youness Alaoui a écrit : > >> I think we should close the SF forums, keep only the recording > >> grounds forum, have sticky notes, forum Rules, and if we get an > >> answer like that, we just close the thread with the "read the rules/ > >> faq or you'll be banned", that would be soooo nice!!!!!!!!!!!! -- Karol Krizka
pgpHrHBM0Dc3x.pgp
Description: PGP signature
