Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
>Aengus Lawlor wrote:
>
>> Each virtual server has it's own logfile, so I'm using
>>
>> LOGFILE D:\LOGFILES\W3SVC1\EX0006*.LOG http://server1
>> LOGFILE D:\LOGFILES\W3SVC2\EX0006*.LOG http://server2
>> etc
>>
>> Analog is tracking the requests from each virtual server properly,
>> because my Request Report is listing the requests from server1 and
>> server2 as I would expect it to, but I'm also getting a
>> Turning off Empty Virtual Host Report
>> warning.
>
>I believe you need the %v column in your logfiles for Analog to generate the
>Virtual Host report. Adding a virtual hostname to the LOGFILE line is not
>enough.
I was afraid you were going to say that, but I can't think of any
obvious reason why it needs to be that way - if I generate separate
logfiles per virtual server, there's no need to log %v, because I
already know which vhost each log line belongs to. I would think that
Analog should be assume the value of %v from the second argument?
Is there any way I can get a VHOST report without modifying gigabytes of
logfiles?
(I've never particularly cared about this report until now, but it would
be helpful in evaluating something that has come up recently).
Aengus
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
mailing list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe" in the main BODY OF THE MESSAGE.
List archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
