Aengus Lawlor wrote:
> Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
>
> >Aengus Lawlor wrote:
> >
> >> Each virtual server has it's own logfile, so I'm using
> >>
> >> LOGFILE D:\LOGFILES\W3SVC1\EX0006*.LOG http://server1
> >> LOGFILE D:\LOGFILES\W3SVC2\EX0006*.LOG http://server2
> >> etc
> >>
> >> Analog is tracking the requests from each virtual server properly,
> >> because my Request Report is listing the requests from server1 and
> >> server2 as I would expect it to, but I'm also getting a
> >> Turning off Empty Virtual Host Report
> >> warning.
> >
> >I believe you need the %v column in your logfiles for Analog to generate the
> >Virtual Host report. Adding a virtual hostname to the LOGFILE line is not
> >enough.
>
> I was afraid you were going to say that, but I can't think of any
> obvious reason why it needs to be that way - if I generate separate
> logfiles per virtual server, there's no need to log %v, because I
> already know which vhost each log line belongs to. I would think that
> Analog should be assume the value of %v from the second argument?
I don't see that there is a reason it shouldn't work that way either, but maybe
Stephen can shed some light on that design decision. :)
> Is there any way I can get a VHOST report without modifying gigabytes of
> logfiles?
Patch Analog?
Jeremy Wadsack
Wadsack-Allen Digital Group
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
mailing list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe" in the main BODY OF THE MESSAGE.
List archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
