Melissa - Do you know anything about this?
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Per Jessen Sent: Sun 9/2/2007 6:30 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [analog-help] Re: analog autoconf'ed ? (was: The next'best'analyzer...?) Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > Per, just because all those lignux people use autoconf doesn't mean > you should, too. I happen to be one of those too :-) > On one end of the spectrum there's Linux kernel where > lots of things need to be configured pre-compilation. It's not using > autoconf because autoconf can't handle that level of complexity. On > the other end there's analog with one header file Analog today has six header files. > which you don't even > need to touch 99% of the time. It's not using autoconf because there's > nothing there to autoconf. How about if I'd like to use a locally available version of e.g. libpcre, libgd, libz and libpng? As a sysadmin surely that has crossed your mind. /Per Jessen, Zürich +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general +------------------------------------------------------------------------
<<winmail.dat>>
+------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general +------------------------------------------------------------------------
