Aengus wrote: > Okay, Pers, I think you've had your fun, and it's time to call a halt. >
OK. (my name is just "Per"). > If you have anything useful to suggest about improvements that might > warrant a new version of Analog, please feel free to ask for input and > other help on this list. Does anyone maintain a wishlist? I have a couple of improvements that I'm using with the XML output, but I haven't done any work on preparing it for public consumption. > I'm not currently moderator of this list, so don't take this as a > warning of any kind - it's simply a suggestion that you 'cop yourself > on", and stop wasting everyone elses time. Aengus, who is wasting time here? The list is hardly busy, the project hasn't had a new release in 3-4 years, there is no developer nor a developer-community. The traffic on this list revolves around helping newbies decrypt the analog documentation (which could do with a new coat of paint). Nothing wrong in that, but why hasn't someone thought to pick it up and rewrite the docu to make it clearer/more accessible/whatever? analog does a really good job, but it's not exactly going anywhere. /Per Jessen, Zürich +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general +------------------------------------------------------------------------
