Sure -- I need to send out an agenda for consolidated staff tomorrow, but perhaps you and Kevin can share your experiences and talk about the dev process and use of fab?
[Note -- we will have staff tomorrow] -Toby On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Grace Gellerman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Should we talk more about this in our Research staff meeting on Tuesday? > > I agree that we need to figure out prioritization process first. Also > keeping two systems active could lead to requests going into two places > which could affect the workflow of prioritization. > > I see the advantages to using Phab, but haste can sometimes, ya know, make > waste. So let's talk about this more... > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Toby Negrin <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> To be clear - I do not want to move to Fabricator without reviewing our >> prioritization process. >> >> Shall we make this a Q3 goal since people seem really into it? >> >> On Dec 15, 2014, at 10:44 AM, Leila Zia <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Oliver, >> >> I'd like to give Phabricator a try. I suggest the following steps if >> we decide to do it: >> >> 1. We block a 15-min team time in December during which R&D will play >> with Phabricator in https://phab-01.wmflabs.org/ If we all feel >> reasonably comfortable, then, >> 2. We switch to Phabricator in January, at the beginning of Q3, and >> we aim to try it for one quarter [1]. If it works, great, if not, >> 3. We go back to Trello. >> >> Leila >> >> [1] During the quarter, we keep Trello but we don't update it. If we >> figure out some time during the quarter that we can't work with Phabricator >> at all, we switch back to Trello and all we need to do is to add Q3's tasks >> back to it. >> >> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Dan Andreescu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> So those are the reasons I have, off the top of my head. Other reasons? >>>> Counter-arguments? Post em here. >>>> >>> >>> Agreed, Phabricator is a good tool, and great if it creates a single >>> place where we manage our projects. >>> >>> It's not all great though. Trello has a much more refined notification >>> system and much prettier interface. Mingle has more powerful queries, >>> Asana is more to the point, etc. We've been over these and decided as an >>> organization to move towards Phabricator, I'm certainly not trying to dig >>> up old wounds. I do want to say though: bring those positive experiences >>> when you switch from a system you like. Because Phabricator is open source >>> and the Facebook team that maintains it has been super friendly and helpful >>> to us during our migration. If we criticize it constructively, Phabricator >>> will only get better. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Analytics mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> Analytics mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Analytics mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > >
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
