Sure, but ownership does not mean "knows everything" it means "Makes
sure it gets done". MediaWiki is owned by everyone, sure, but the
actual idea of what MediaWiki core is has a team. The MediaWiki core
team.

On 3 December 2015 at 13:07, Nuria Ruiz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>So the pageview definition, one of our core organisational KPIs, is owned
>> simultaneously by everyone?
> Sure, just like mediawiki codebase is collectively own.
>
> Personally I do not see that as a problem and regardless I think it reflects
> reality, analytics team -as I mentioned before- doesn't have the knowledge
> or authority to "decide" what constitutes a search pageview without talking
> to the team/devs/community memebers that actually know how search works.
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Oliver Keyes <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> So the pageview definition, one of our core organisational KPIs, is
>> owned simultaneously by everyone?
>>
>> On 3 December 2015 at 12:54, Nuria Ruiz <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>Who does own it?
>> > On our opinion every team should own the definition of a pageview in
>> > their
>> > product right and when in doubt analytics or research can be involved to
>> > provide feedback on lessons learned.
>> >
>> > For example: who is best qualified than IOS team to decide what
>> > constitutes
>> > a page in the IOS app?
>> >
>> > With that in mind I have created a ticket to define what constitutes a
>> > Search pageview: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T120249
>> >
>> > Let me know what is a good discovery project to tag this ticket with so
>> > this
>> > ticket gets some visibility.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Nuria
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Oliver Keyes <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 2 December 2015 at 15:38, Nuria Ruiz <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>It's true that MediaWiki supports search based solely on the ?search
>> >> >> query
>> >> >> parameter. Regardless of whether title=Special:Search is specified.
>> >> >>This is mostly for legacy reasons as search predates the concept of
>> >> >> special
>> >> >> pages.
>> >> >>However, would it make sense to instead count these as page views for
>> >> >> 'Special:Search'?
>> >> >
>> >> > One thing worth clarifying is that analytics team doesn't own the
>> >> > pageview
>> >> > definition (https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Page_view), we
>> >> > implement it to the best of our ability. Deciding what constitutes a
>> >> > pageview for search falls on the search team as they are the ones
>> >> > that
>> >> > know
>> >> > their functionality best (substitute "search team" by "some entity
>> >> > with
>> >> > knowledge of mediawiki's search abilities") According to Timo's
>> >> > comment
>> >> > it
>> >> > seems that "?search" requests should be counted as true pageviews but
>> >> > let us
>> >> > know otherwise via phab ticket or this list.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Who does own it?
>> >>
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> > Nuria
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
>> >> > <[email protected]>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Oliver Keyes, 02/12/2015 18:52:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Via Brian Davis we find out the responsible patch is
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> https://github.com/wikimedia/analytics-refinery-source/commit/05e5da92553dbd3e691eb45d40e559895337935f
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Context:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_talk:Page_view/Archive_1#Parameters_appended_to_short_URLs
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Nemo
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> Analytics mailing list
>> >> >> [email protected]
>> >> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Analytics mailing list
>> >> > [email protected]
>> >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Oliver Keyes
>> >> Count Logula
>> >> Wikimedia Foundation
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Analytics mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Analytics mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Oliver Keyes
>> Count Logula
>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Analytics mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Analytics mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>



-- 
Oliver Keyes
Count Logula
Wikimedia Foundation

_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

Reply via email to