Hi, haisweety, Thanks for your comments first. It can be concluded that you have done some survey, but you have made many mistakes in some parts. We have done survey and research in detail before this project started last year. VNC is a famous open protocol for remote desktop. We have been the users of some products that support this protocol. However, it have defects that makes we not choose it as the default protocol. In our document, we compared in detail for the two protocols. If someone is interested, please send the email to ask for it. (1)"Compared with what you guys did, it is more universal and can control everything on PC from either any PC or any browser equipped device. " (2)"Actually it can control everything on PC. What you did seems like only a couple of special applications that have interfaces you provided can be used. " Sorry, this two points are totally wrong. Our products can control everything too. In demo we show some characters of the application. We take many considerations for the user's sake. We're not only a remote desktop, but this doesn't mean we don't provide a remote desktop. You can clearly know it through the Demo video.
"The only advantage you might have is that the data can be stored locally or received from PC into device." Not only this, we can manage many PCs, transfer things seamlessly among them and switch remote control/application/PCs/desktop/... quickly and seamlessly among them(VNC can hardly do that). We provide SaaS service, that common VNC doesn't provide. We have many performances advantage besides some features that VNC doesn't provide. To be a summary, VNC is a good protocol and can be more easily implemented than ours, but we don't choose it because some of its limit and our greater plan. please take more surveys about our project if you have interest in it. Comments are welcomed:) Ours is universal and control everything on PC too, please first get knowlege about our projects:) On Apr 14, 12:24 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your idea is good but I have to say you guys really wasted your time. > Your idea was already implemented in a more universal and elegant way. > Check this one and you will understand > why:http://sourceforge.net/projects/ajaxvnc/ > > There are also some similar applications with this in sourceforge if > you do a search. Basically it is a remote control tool that can be > used by web browser. Compared with what you guys did, it is more > universal and can control everything on PC from either any PC or any > browser equipped device. > Though it seems not quite mature, it is implemented pretty simple(I > can wrote it myself in less than 5 days if I got that idea) and very > easy to use. Plus it has at least two advantages over yours: > 1. It doesn't require any extra application installed in mobile > device. An ajax compatible browser is enough to remotely control the > computer either from phone or from another PC. I tried it in android > browser and it works fine. > 2. Actually it can control everything on PC. What you did seems like > only a couple of special applications that have interfaces you > provided can be used. > > The only advantage you might have is that the data can be stored > locally or received from PC into device. But that doesn't sound pretty > impressive. > > On 4月13日, 下午9时37分, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > (1)I agree that PCs might be implemented in similiar way. But one of > > the points is that the mobile device could be taken anywhere, anyway, > > we can hardly take a PC everywhere and internet everywhere, at least > > now. Here the android phone is somewhat like a control center. It's > > the biggest advantage. That's why we call it a mobile solution. > > For example, "Image the scenes, you are a businessman, you might open > > your laptop, and want to send an emergent email, only to find there is > > not any wireless network in nearby area. You are a scientist,you have > > a sudden idea, but you can hardly calculate (2^30)! or draw a 3D > > object graph with your phone immediately, and you try to find a > > computer madly. You are a music fan, but you can take only a few good > > quality music videos in your smart phone. What if we can take my > > computer with me as the phone?" > > (2)We have already done some work for what I mentioned above and > > solved some important problem. But I do agree that it need a long way > > to go, also including the market, the users' habits and thoughts, and > > many things. > > > On Apr 13, 8:46 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > I think this is a totally different situation. What you mentioned is > > > too huge. Implementing it in this way may not be as easy as what > > > you've already done with mobile-PC data transfer. If it was, software > > > like Photoshop would be implemented in this way much earilier than > > > android appeared because what you mentioned is not specifically for > > > mobile device but more suitable for PC. > > > > I am just commenting as if this was done by me, what kind of problem I > > > will face. Hope my comment can shed some light on you and wish this > > > concept finished. > > > > On 4月13日, 下午7时49分, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Current web browser doesn't support the user to use most of current > > > > software. > > > > For example, the user want to use adobe Photoshop(ok, or similiar > > > > software if adobe won't give the license) to do some image editing > > > > work. He/she can use the phone, log onto the web, use the software > > > > online. (This software works as a web service) > > > > > On Apr 13, 7:33 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Is there anything special for what you called SaaS mode? I mean is > > > > > there anything that can't be done online like google calendar or > > > > > google notes but can be done with SaaS mode? > > > > > In my opinion if the user can do the same thing using web browser, > > > > > they wouldn't be willing to install the app and do it on both sides. > > > > > > On 4月13日, 下午4时58分, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Yes，if you are using it with your own computers, you should install > > > > > > host application on the PC. > > > > > > However, we provides SaaS mode, that can run single application on > > > > > > the > > > > > > phone without PC. That is, you can run software that we provide on > > > > > > our > > > > > > web. > > > > > > Thank you:) > > > > > > > On Apr 13, 2:31 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks for the reply. I guess there must be a host application > > > > > > > installed on PC at the same time and you have to run two apps for > > > > > > > PC > > > > > > > and device each, is it? > > > > > > > Actually what you did is just the first thing came into my mind > > > > > > > when I > > > > > > > heard android. But I am a little worried about the judgement on > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > extra none apk app so I finally give up on this idea. > > > > > > > And you implement that idea and it seems more than what I > > > > > > > expected. > > > > > > > Good luck- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
