Hi YA,

That's a good point, but is the 800 Mhz spectrum that Verizon acquired going
to be used for Android? As for the iPhone, it may have been AT&T only, but
it did rock a number of content aggregators to the core. They lost a lot of
business and power. Major companies went down.

Personally, I think Android is going to succeed, but I think it's going to
take a big fight. It's not a done deal.

Shane

On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 8:20 PM, YA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> Shane:
>
> iPhone is ATT-only device, in case you forgot. However, seems to me
> you forgot a much more important event - the 800 Mhz auction that
> Google so charitably bid through the roof to make sure it is all sold
> as one network...and that is decreed open network.
>
> This is why we were toiling here - we are part of this big game.
>
> YA
>
> On Apr 21, 6:50 am, "Shane Isbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yep, it's carrier devices that are the concern. I'm only talking about
> the
> > US; and if Europe is completely open, I suppose you guys are going to
> have
> > smooth sailing with Android. But in the US, a carrier can have the
> > manufacturer rip out or change all sorts of features from the base
> model.
> > The problem from a mobile developer's perspective is that the majority
> of
> > their market is using a locked device. $800 retail for an android device
> or
> > $300 from the carrier means a lot more locked devices and a lot smaller
> > market.
> >
> > And if you start to have a great deal of success with a service, the
> carrier
> > may decide to shut the service down, or threaten to do so, by blocking
> it at
> > the network level, forcing you to the table (rumors are that this
> happened
> > to Google a few years back).
> >
> > Everyone in the industry is waiting for the shoe to fall; they have been
> for
> > a long time. Once one carrier in the US bolts from the pack and opens
> up,
> > the other carriers are going to have to follow. Apple has already done a
> lot
> > to change the industry and wrestle the tight grip control from
> carriers.Who
> > knows? Android may deal the final blow. But it is not bad to hedge the
> bets
> > and work on how things are at the moment. And that means, dealing with
> the
> > carriers.
> >
> > Shane
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 5:36 PM, YA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Shane:
> >
> > > if you have a CARRIER device - yes. They can lock the system. If
> > > however you have an open device - carriers will be able to do nothing.
> > > Trust me. I used unlocked devices on locked carriers and never ever
> > > had any problem, nor there is a way to hack the phone system by
> > > inserting a different SIM card.
> >
> > > YA
> >
> > > On Apr 19, 7:37 pm, "Shane Isbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Lol. Carriers own the network. They can do what they want with
> devices
> > > they
> > > > subsidize. Davlik is going to have all sorts of security built on
> top of
> > > it.
> > > > To access certain features, will require the carrier signing the
> app.
> > > And in
> > > > certain cases, the carriers would not be wrong in doing so for
> security
> > > > reasons.
> >
> > > > Shane
> >
> > > > On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 4:41 AM, YA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > If you use an Android handset, there is no way for a carrier to
> lock
> > > > > out any third apps except by tweaking the Android core or Dalvik
> to
> > > > > make is carrier-compatible only. A generic Android handset,
> however,
> > > > > will run over any network and will run any apps its owner pleases.
> >
> > > > > YA
> >
> > > > > On Apr 19, 2:38 pm, Hielko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Quote: If we (by we I mean all of us) don't have a large,
> organized
> > > > > > community with
> > > > > > content to deliver, what do you think the chances are a carrier
> is
> > > > > > going to
> > > > > > allow any non-approved application the "rights" to install other
> > > > > > applications? If not zero, then its close to zero.
> >
> > > > > > Members of the OHA have signed an agreement that they will not
> limit
> > > > > > the functionality of the android platform/the freedom of the
> users,
> > > to
> > > > > > install what they want. Members of the OHA include some large
> > > > > > carriers, so I'm not afraid of the scenario that you are
> painting.
> > > > > > Android is not like other platforms!
> >
> > > > > > On Apr 19, 11:41 am, "Shane Isbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > I'm just trying to clarify SlideME since the feedback we got
> was
> > > > > completely
> > > > > > > not the message we are intending to put out there. I'm not
> saying
> > > > > anything
> > > > > > > about number of submissions. I'm trying to clarify that we are
> not
> > > a
> > > > > catalog
> > > > > > > or database.
> >
> > > > > > > Shane
> >
> > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 2:35 AM, Peli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > Shane,
> >
> > > > > > > > You just announced your site a week or two ago. It takes
> time
> > > for
> > > > > > > > people to discover your site. Put a clickable link to
> SlideME
> > > into
> > > > > > > > every post you write in this forum and you'll get the
> traffic
> > > :-)
> >
> > > > > > > > Peli
> > > > > > > > CLICK HERE -->>>www.openintents.org<<<-- CLICK HERE!!! ;-)
> ;-)
> >
> > > > > > > > On Apr 19, 10:03 am, "Shane Isbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > For some reason, I don't think we at SlideME have done a
> good
> > > job
> > > > > > > > > communicating what we are about. After reviewing a lot of
> > > feedback
> > > > > we
> > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > gotten, it seems that many developers think SlideME is
> about
> > > > > searching
> > > > > > > > or
> > > > > > > > > browsing for applications. We are not a database. We are
> not a
> > > > > baby
> > > > > > > > > HelloAndroid. We are about stocking and delivery of
> > > applications
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > emulators and soon-to-be devices. We deal with the whole
> work
> > > flow
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > getting the application from the developer to the end
> user,
> > > for
> > > > > mobile.
> > > > > > > > We
> > > > > > > > > are building the server and Android client side components
> to
> > > make
> > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > happen by the time devices launch at the end of this year.
> >
> > > > > > > > > Shane- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Challenge" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to