I have a theory. Some of the judges just don't know that they are testing server-client apps and wouldn't think that in fact they are being watched, so they don't care. If a judge is tired or has better things to do they may read the readme and move on. If you're lucky.
If that's true or not I don't know. In any case if they announce the winners tomorrow they can get ready for some real bad publicity. And a bad start is the last thing Android needs right now. aksonov wrote: > I don't understand something - top 100 app were selected (?!) but I > still have ONE testing for my client/server app. Do we have ONE judge > per application?? Or applications were selected without looking into > them?? I didn't expect that Google could organize things in such > way... Ogh, my belief in Google as "company for people" is broken. > > If it happened not only with me, please post here. > I don't believe that it is OK for Google to get such negative feedback > from many submitters, this way ADC become just lottery or something > like this (when just one judge could decide application is good or > not) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
