A method can be patented.  And not 'anything'
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Marco Nelissen <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> "You can never patent abstract ideas. Game ideas cannot be patented"
>
> OK, so we've established you're not a patent lawyer... :)
> My favorite patent is the one for swinging sideways on a swing, which
> IMO illustrates you can patent pretty much anything.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Ikon <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Your contention that "grown up operating systems" should not allow you
> > to copy ideas is totally unfounded.  You can never patent abstracty
> > ideas. Game ideas cannot be patented.  Whether they should be is a
> > different discussion.  You can go right and now, and make a game on
> > Windows with a story very similar to fallout, and write all your own
> > code, and use all your own graphics/sound assets and you will not be
> > infringing on that IP in any way.  A company may come and try to sue
> > you, but that has no relevance to a maturity of an operating system.
> >
> > On Apr 13, 10:43 am, Sundog <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Anyone who is surprised by this must be very, very new to the
> >> programming game. I've been waiting for this since the store opened.
> >>
> >> IMHO, to the extent that the Android community becomes a proxy for
> >> those that think All Ideas Should Be Free And Stealable, that is the
> >> extent to which Android will never be a real grown-up operating
> >> system.
> >>
> >> On Apr 7, 8:43 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Saturday April 4th, I received a message from google saying that my
> >> > game "Robotic Space Rock" was pulled from the android market after a
> >> > request made by a legal firm representing an entity known as Tetris
> >> > Company. My application was removed from the android market together
> >> > with Blocks, Cubik, Net Tetris, Netblocks and Tetroid (6 apps in
> >> > total) under claim that it violates the DMCA and more specifically
> >> > trademarks and copyrighted material owned by the Tetris Company.
> >> > However, none of the trademarks or copyrighted material (music,
> >> > graphics and sound effects) are present in my game. Sound effects and
> >> > music were created by me specifically for the game. There is no
> >> > reference to the word tetris in the game. Additionally, all the game
> >> > code, graphics and sound effects  were created by me and published on
> >> > the code sitehttp://code.google.com/p/monolithandroid
> >>
> >> > Additionally, I am not aware of a software patent covering the game
> >> > mechanics of Tetris, so I cannot see how I could violate something
> >> > that is not protected by a software patent. Also, even if the game was
> >> > protected by a patent, the patent would have expired, since the
> >> > original game, Tetris, was created 23 years ago. However game
> >> > mechanics cannot be covered by patents.
> >>
> >> > I would also like to point out that my game is available completely
> >> > free of charge to every user of the android market.
> >>
> >> > I wrote those concerns to Google and I sent an email to the EFF. The
> >> > bottom line is that for my application to be restored on the android
> >> > market, I have to send a DMCA counter-notification. And then the
> >> > Tetris Company can sue and take the case to Court.
> >>
> >> > When games were pulled from the iPhone App store, they blamed apple,
> >> > but it is not hard to see that behind application removals we can find
> >> > companies like the Tetris Company, that demand application removals
> >> > claiming copyright infringement and trademarks. However, it is not
> >> > easy to battle these companies as individual developers. I, for
> >> > example, am a Greek citizen living in Greece, so it is difficult for
> >> > me to file a counter-notification, because then the Tetris company
> >> > will probably sue me and I will have to defend my case in court. Why
> >> > should I bother? Am I making money out of the game? No! But even if I
> >> > did you can see how easy it is for corporations to neutralize
> >> > developers like that. I think that something should be done.
> >> > Independent developers should get together to battle against such
> >> > misuse of the law by corporations.
> >> > And to those that want more facts, you can find more details on my
> >> > blog:http://tkcodesharing.blogspot.com
> > >
> >
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to