Hello Prady, << You mean Google Ad supported low-cost or free mobile service? >>
I don't known what is the plan of Google. But, as far as I heard, I understood that Google plans to provide low cost mobile services. This may be some false information... There is so much rumour about Google's strategy. And, anyway, you are right: Offering low cost mobile services is not possible anywhere in the world... Especially in France, where the 3 big mobile service providers are making every think they can to keep the market closed. I don't know the situation in the U.S. But I imagine that it would be much more easier than in France. So, once more, American business men will develop mobile business before French. And they will get the market. Anyway, think about it: Offering a low cost mobile service for Gphone users would be the best way to spread Gphones. Average users first look à the price of the subscription. - First : The price of the subscription. - Second : The look of the phone. - Third : The set of applications. The more poeple use an OS, the more you can develop useful applications. The OS is important for geeks only, or for people like me that have ideas to make money (I need a "standart", and I need a good API)... It means, the OS is not important for the vast majority (the end-users). Regards, Denis On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Prady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > *Point 2* : If Google offers low cost (free?) mobile's services (voice > and > > Internet), then it will attract users. > > Denis > You mean Google Ad supported low-cost or free mobile service? :) :) > Let Google think whether this is financially viable in any geography > in the world. :) > > By the way, Android mobile OS is free for mobile handset manufacturers > and application developers. > thanks > Prady > > On Aug 19, 7:41 pm, "Denis BEURIVE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello folks, > > > > What do you want to do with Adroïd? > > > > - Do you want to develop fun stuff? > > - Or do you want to develop services in order to make big money? > > > > If you want to develop fun stuff, then you need all the little gadgets > you > > are talking about. > > > > I don't care about the video. I don't care about bluetooth (yet). I don't > > care about gadgets. What I want is : > > > > 1. I want an open platform that gives me access to all the phone > > functionalities. > > 2. I want a standard platform, so I don't need to develop my > application > > for all OS and mobiles. > > > > *Point 1* : With the new version of the API, it seems that Google is > keeping > > its promise : It seems that the API will allow developers to acces the > > important mobile's functionnalities. > > > > *Point 2* : If Google offers low cost (free?) mobile's services (voice > and > > Internet), then it will attract users. > > > > Regards, > > > > Denis > > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 3:33 PM, rezar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I saw HTC dream from here: > > >http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/first_android_phone_just_approved > > > It doesn't support video recording and camera really sucks (3 mpb), > > > and most importantly where is bluetooth ? > > > Guys at google I think you forget that bluletooth is going to be a > > > social sensor in future do you ? > > > I though google will make some really iPhone killer not just another > > > phone !!! > > > If bluetooth will not get support I will go definitly for windows > > > mobile. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
