blindfold wrote: > Secondly, in my app I have my own built-in benchmark that checks > whether speed performance is adequate for real-time use. No need to > have an unrelated benchmark that will give irrelevant figures.
You are certainly welcome to your opinion. Others in the community may value markets that offer integrated standardized benchmarks, so they can simply say "works well with a CaffeineMark score of X or better" in one form or fashion and increase their odds of users getting a good result. This is even more important for fee-based apps, as you normally want to get a handle on performance before you pay, not after. I think it's ideas like Al's integrated-benchmark, along with nimbleness of execution, that will help markets like hold their own the stock Android Market. But, maybe that's just me. Hopefully, he can find a way to integrate these sorts of things yet not somehow detract from developers like yourself who offer, in your own apps, a more-related benchmark that will give more-relevant figures. -- Mark Murphy (a Commons Guy) http://commonsware.com _The Busy Coder's Guide to Android Development_ Version 1.9 Published! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
