I didn't say they should be KILLED, to translate for you, they MIGHT AS WELL be dead.
And if you don't agree with me that any job requires some rudimentary standard skills (I never said that everyone needs to type 50+ wpm, just the BASICS), then I challenge you to find one and present it. Someone who doesn't have ANY of the required skills to be employed is someone who WILL NEVER be employed (or at least not for long...) and will therefore be a drain (i.e. welfare). And quite frankly, *I WOULD RATHER BE DEAD* than to be unemployable. Now don't bother responding to me again. I have absolutely no interest in you or anything you have to say. In other words, screw off and don't come back. On Sep 19, 4:58 pm, Mike Dent <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/9/19 lbcoder <[email protected]>: > > > That's a terrible idea. > > Anybody who can't type in this day and age (except for a few really > > really old people who wouldn't be interested in new tech anyways) > > should be dead. They certainly are unworthy of something as simple as > > EMPLOYMENT and therefore can't AFFORD a phone -- isn't that step one > > for getting a job? Knowing how to type and basic computer use? Even > > people in automotive repair and construction need such simple skills. > > lbcoder, regardless of the original posters points you do often come > out with some utter c...@p! > How on earth can you say that people who cannot type should be dead > and that being able to > type is a requirement for getting a job? > Which planet do you come from? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
