Such and angry and sad person at a guess. Every group has one. 2009/9/20 lbcoder <[email protected]>: > > I didn't say they should be KILLED, to translate for you, they MIGHT > AS WELL be dead. > > And if you don't agree with me that any job requires some rudimentary > standard skills (I never said that everyone needs to type 50+ wpm, > just the BASICS), then I challenge you to find one and present it. > > Someone who doesn't have ANY of the required skills to be employed is > someone who WILL NEVER be employed (or at least not for long...) and > will therefore be a drain (i.e. welfare). > > > And quite frankly, *I WOULD RATHER BE DEAD* than to be unemployable. > > > Now don't bother responding to me again. I have absolutely no interest > in you or anything you have to say. > In other words, screw off and don't come back. > > > On Sep 19, 4:58 pm, Mike Dent <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2009/9/19 lbcoder <[email protected]>: >> >> > That's a terrible idea. >> > Anybody who can't type in this day and age (except for a few really >> > really old people who wouldn't be interested in new tech anyways) >> > should be dead. They certainly are unworthy of something as simple as >> > EMPLOYMENT and therefore can't AFFORD a phone -- isn't that step one >> > for getting a job? Knowing how to type and basic computer use? Even >> > people in automotive repair and construction need such simple skills. >> >> lbcoder, regardless of the original posters points you do often come >> out with some utter c...@p! >> How on earth can you say that people who cannot type should be dead >> and that being able to >> type is a requirement for getting a job? >> Which planet do you come from? > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
