I posted my view in the comments section. To me the "No private APIs" is just more PR to try and make people think Android is more open than it is, and because Google are trying performing misleading PR like this I, for one, am now taking every word that comes from an official Android source with a pinch of salt. Al. -- * Looking for Android Apps? - Try http://andappstore.com/ * ====== Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the company number 6741909. The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's subsidiaries. On 27 Apr 2010, at 21:55, Mark Murphy wrote:
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en. |
- [android-discuss] There are no secret APIs GodsMoon
- Re: [android-discuss] There are no secret APIs Mark Murphy
- Re: [android-discuss] There are no secret AP... Al Sutton
- Re: [android-discuss] There are no secret APIs Shane Isbell
- [android-discuss] Re: There are no secret APIs Jim Ancona
- [android-discuss] Re: There are no secret AP... GodsMoon
- [android-discuss] Re: There are no secret AP... GodsMoon
- Re: [android-discuss] Re: There are no s... Mark Murphy
- Re: [android-discuss] Re: There are ... Karthik Ravi Shankar
- [android-discuss] Re: There are no s... GodsMoon
- Re: [android-discuss] Re: There... Mark Murphy
- [android-discuss] Re: There... GodsMoon
- [android-discuss] Re: T... a genius
