Hello , Everyone should just upgrade to 64 bit OSes by now.
The only thing that's 32 bit is acroread now. Regards, Michael Cheselka 650-488-4820 On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 23:43, Al Sutton <[email protected]> wrote: > You can, but if the only reason you're running 32 bit is to compile Android > then it would make more sense to upgrade to 64 bit to get the best > performance. > > Al. > -- > > * Looking for Android Apps? - Try http://andappstore.com/ * > > ====== > Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the company > number 6741909. > > The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not necessarily > those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's subsidiaries. > > On 5 Oct 2010, at 00:42, bmullan wrote: > >> Can't you use KVM on your Ubuntu 32 bit system and just run a 64 Bit >> Ubuntu as a VM ... and do your development in the VM ?? >> >> >> On Oct 4, 2:56 pm, Al Sutton <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Many people installed the 32 bit version of Ubuntu to compile Android 2.2 >>> and below. The requirement for a 64 bit version of the OS means doing a >>> completely new install on any systems they want to build on with the >>> possibility of having to set up dual boot if they want to work on 2.2 and >>> the next version. >>> >>> And that, Mr. Genius, certainly does have an impact on people. >>> >>> Al. >>> -- >>> >>> * Looking for Android Apps? - Tryhttp://andappstore.com/* >>> >>> ====== >>> Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the company >>> number 6741909. >>> >>> The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not >>> necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's >>> subsidiaries. >>> >>> On 4 Oct 2010, at 19:49, a genius wrote: >>> >>>> Given that every computer sold these days (in the last several years, >>>> in fact) more powerful than an INTEL ATOM has a 64bit processor, I >>>> don't see how this could have any kind of impact on you. You certainly >>>> aren't trying to build android on an atom, are you? >>> >>>> ... not that ANY of the rumors about android 3 are panning out. >>> >>>> On Sep 21, 2:45 pm, galib <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> I heard that in order to build Android 3.0 you need your build host >>>>> computer to have a 64bit OS installed (similar to Chromium OS build >>>>> requirement). >>> >>>>> Is this true? >>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>> "Android Discuss" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit this group >>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Android Discuss" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Android Discuss" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en.
