On 5/24/17 12:07 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
Adam Roach <[email protected]> wrote:
> My strong recommendation here would be to define a new GRASP protocol
> numbers registry, state that any values in the GRASP registry that
> correspond to a protocol in the
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers/protocol-numbers.xhtml
> registry SHOULD use the same number (which you imply by your current
> choices to be a Good Thing), and that any values that are appropriate
> for GRASP but not general protocol numbers SHOULD be assigned by IANA
> starting with 252, with each subsequent such registration using the
> next smaller number available.
Actually, we aren't limited to 1-octet.
It's a CBOR integer, and grows automatically.
So we could have >=256 for GRASP-only things.
That's even better.
/a
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
