Hi, > On 25 May 2017, at 03:23, Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Is it sufficient to state that the currently defined values are from > https://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers/protocol-numbers.xhtml > and that the encoding of values for protocols that do not have IP protocol > numbers is for further study? Personally I'd rather do that than try to > resolve this question on the fly. As Michael pointed out, CBOR gives > us a lot of freedom on how to resolve this without any change to > the protocol syntax.
I know that IANA registries can be peoples' favourite bike sheds, but from where I stand doing what you suggest above would be better than doing nothing. I am happy for you and Adam to reach an alternative agreement on what should be done for GRASP, but the above looks sufficient for now. Best Regards, Alexey _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
