On 26/05/2017 03:34, Adam Roach wrote: > On 5/25/17 08:58, Michael Richardson wrote: >> There was a further locator that I tried to create, see: >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-06#section-3.1.2 > > > Yes, the fact that we're already seeing this field extended tells me > that this is crying out for a registry. > > So we have an extension point, we have a need to ensure uniqueness, and > the IETF as an institution have known way to handle situations like that. > > With regards to this being a bikeshed -- I'm not keen to argue about the > color of the bikeshed too much, but I think it's manifestly obvious that > we *need* a bikeshed here. If we could get agreement on that fact -- > that a registry is called for -- I'd be happy to let the WG and authors > figure out the exact color. My advice? Do what's simple.
Yes. Point taken Brian _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
