On 5/25/17 08:58, Michael Richardson wrote:
There was a further locator that I tried to create, see:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-06#section-3.1.2
Yes, the fact that we're already seeing this field extended tells me
that this is crying out for a registry.
So we have an extension point, we have a need to ensure uniqueness, and
the IETF as an institution have known way to handle situations like that.
With regards to this being a bikeshed -- I'm not keen to argue about the
color of the bikeshed too much, but I think it's manifestly obvious that
we *need* a bikeshed here. If we could get agreement on that fact --
that a registry is called for -- I'd be happy to let the WG and authors
figure out the exact color. My advice? Do what's simple.
/a
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
