Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
    > I have started the process of going through IESG comments on the GRASP
    > draft.  Where something is editorial or obviously non-controversial, I
    > will not ask for input. But I do need input on some things, and here is
    > the first.  Please answer quickly; no answer will be taken to mean that
    > you don't care...

    > Alexy wrote:
    >>> uri-locator = [O_URI_LOCATOR, text]
    >>>
    >>> I suggest inclusion of optional transport protocol here to match
    >>> other locators and to follow best practices for not encoding
    >>> transport information in URIs.

    > That would become uri-locator = [O_URI_LOCATOR, text, transport-proto,
    > port-number]

    > Opinions? Objections?

If the resource is really at  https://example.com:9943/my/path

what would text, transport-proto be?

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima

Reply via email to