On 31/05/2017 04:37, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > I have
> >> started the process of going through IESG comments on the GRASP >
> >> draft. Where something is editorial or obviously non-controversial, I
> >> > will not ask for input. But I do need input on some things, and here
> >> is > the first. Please answer quickly; no answer will be taken to
> >> mean that > you don't care...
> >>
> >> > Alexy wrote: >>> uri-locator = [O_URI_LOCATOR, text]
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I suggest inclusion of optional transport protocol here to match
> >> >>> other locators and to follow best practices for not encoding >>>
> >> transport information in URIs.
> >>
> >> > That would become uri-locator = [O_URI_LOCATOR, text,
> >> transport-proto, > port-number]
> >>
> >> > Opinions? Objections?
> >>
> >> If the resource is really at https://example.com:9943/my/path
> >>
> >> what would text, transport-proto be?
>
> > "https://example.com:9943/my/path";, Null, Null perhaps.
>
> > Also of course see the thread on Adam Roach's comment.
>
> okay, then give me an example where it wouldn't be null and null?
funnyschema:funny.stuff
Who knows what proto and port might be appropriate? I'll buy
Alexy's suggestion, because it really costs nothing.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
