Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have >> started the process of going through IESG comments on the GRASP > >> draft. Where something is editorial or obviously non-controversial, I >> > will not ask for input. But I do need input on some things, and here >> is > the first. Please answer quickly; no answer will be taken to >> mean that > you don't care... >> >> > Alexy wrote: >>> uri-locator = [O_URI_LOCATOR, text] >> >>> >> >>> I suggest inclusion of optional transport protocol here to match >> >>> other locators and to follow best practices for not encoding >>> >> transport information in URIs. >> >> > That would become uri-locator = [O_URI_LOCATOR, text, >> transport-proto, > port-number] >> >> > Opinions? Objections? >> >> If the resource is really at https://example.com:9943/my/path >> >> what would text, transport-proto be?
> "https://example.com:9943/my/path", Null, Null perhaps. > Also of course see the thread on Adam Roach's comment. okay, then give me an example where it wouldn't be null and null? -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [ _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list Anima@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima