On 30/05/2017 06:49, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have started the process of going through IESG comments on the GRASP > > draft. Where something is editorial or obviously non-controversial, I > > will not ask for input. But I do need input on some things, and here is > > the first. Please answer quickly; no answer will be taken to mean that > > you don't care... > > > Alexy wrote: > >>> uri-locator = [O_URI_LOCATOR, text] > >>> > >>> I suggest inclusion of optional transport protocol here to match > >>> other locators and to follow best practices for not encoding > >>> transport information in URIs. > > > That would become uri-locator = [O_URI_LOCATOR, text, transport-proto, > > port-number] > > > Opinions? Objections? > > If the resource is really at https://example.com:9943/my/path > > what would text, transport-proto be?
"https://example.com:9943/my/path";, Null, Null perhaps. Also of course see the thread on Adam Roach's comment. Brian > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > > _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
