> I agree, but I don't see the value in adding bytes to the wire. +1 To reduce testing effort for adopters of this solution it's best if we do not specify/allow other resources than '/'. We haven't identified yet the value of allowing other resources (only disadvantages).
Esko -----Original Message----- From: Michael Richardson <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 08:07 To: Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> Cc: Esko Dijk <[email protected]>; Carsten Bormann <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Anima] [core] ANIMA constrained-join proxy revision to use CoAP Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > Two comments there: > 1) It would be trivial to extend the definition of the BRSKI_RJP objective by giving > it a meaningful value field, such as a string defining the URI resource name. Like: > objective-value = text ; URI resource name I agree, but I don't see the value in adding bytes to the wire. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
