[resending, recipient list got messed up, sorry] Dear ANIMA-WG
I am hereby want to do a lightweight last call to the WG before moving draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-14 to our AD, Mahesh. draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-06 successfully finished WGLC in early 2023. The editorial feedback from the WG lead to updates finished around draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-11. Afterwards, Matthias Kovatsch did a very thorough shepherd review whose editorial feedback was incorporated up to the curent version, draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-14. I am positive that all those who did provide feedback during WGLC did check that their feedback was correctly addressed, i know mine and Matthias (Shepherds) feedback has been addressed. Likewise, testing with prototypes has successfully been done since WGLC. Neither WGLC feedback nor shepherd review did introduce any functional changes to the protocol, but of course, the amount of restructuring and and editorial improvements to the text is substantial, and this is why Mahesh asked us at IETF120 to check before taking over. Therefore i would like to give the WG a last opportunity to raise issues. If no substantial issues are raised, i will pass on the draft to our AD on 08/23/2024 (end of next week). Thank you so much to everybody who helped to create this work! Toerless - for the chairs. On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 04:20:05PM +0000, Fries, Steffen wrote: > Hi Sheng, > > I will provide an updated version by tomorrow, incorporating the proposed > changes. > > Best regards > Steffen > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sheng Jiang <[email protected]> > > Sent: Montag, 20. Februar 2023 04:42 > > To: anima <[email protected]>; Toerless Eckert <[email protected]>; anima-chairs > > <[email protected]>; draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm <draft-ietf-anima-brski- > > [email protected]>; ietf <[email protected]> > > Cc: ietf <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-06, ends Feb. 15th, 2023 > > > > During the WGLC period, this drafts has received no objections, but > > comments. > > Therefore, the chairs would draw on a passed conclusion . The WG discussed > > the > > authors' suggestion that move the YANG components of this to rfc8366bis and > > reach the consensus to respect the authors' choice. The authors please > > submit > > an update version. Then, the document shepherd can move it forward. > > > > Regards, > > > > > > -------------- > > > > > > > > Sheng Jiang > > > > > > > > >Dear ANIMAers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >This message starts the two-week (*) ANIMA Working Group Last Call to > > advance draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-06, which specifies enhancements to BRSKI > > (RFC8995) to facilitate bootstrapping in domains featuring no or only time > > limited connectivity between a pledge and the domain registrar. This > > document's intended status is Standards Track. At present, there is no IPR > > filed > > against this document. This document has been ANIMA WG document since > > October, 2021 and has received a lot of feedback from the WG and work from > > its authors. The authors therefore think is ready for WGLC. Please send your > > comments by Feb. 15th 2023. If you do not feel this document should advance, > > please state your reasons why. Matthias Kovatsch is the assgined > > document shepherd. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Sheng > > _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
