Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: >> enhances the capability detection of registrars and thus improves detecting >> the registrar matching the pledges functionality instead of trial and >> error. Therefore I would leave it as informative reference.
> I understand that. I still think it would be better for the reference
> to be a published RFC, which would mean asking the RFC Editor to
> wait. (This is an opinion, not a show-stopper.)
{this being a reference from brski-prm to brski-discovery}
I can support the idea of a normative reference.
I don't like creating new clusters though, so I suggest that we wait on
changing the reference.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
