The lightweight 2nd WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm has finished without
any concerns being raised beyond nits from Brian Carpenter (thanks) that
where fixed by the new revision uploaded.

Thanks a lot everybody! I have requested publication for the draft.

Cheers
    Toerless (for the chairs)

On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 10:10:45AM +0200, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> [resending, recipient list got messed up, sorry]
> 
> Dear ANIMA-WG
> 
> I am hereby want to do a lightweight last call to the WG before moving 
> draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-14 to our AD, Mahesh.
> 
> draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-06 successfully finished WGLC in early 2023.
> The editorial feedback from the WG lead to updates finished around 
> draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-11.
> Afterwards, Matthias Kovatsch did a very thorough shepherd review whose 
> editorial
> feedback was incorporated up to the curent version, 
> draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-14.
> 
> I am positive that all those who did provide feedback during WGLC did check 
> that
> their feedback was correctly addressed, i know mine and Matthias (Shepherds) 
> feedback
> has been addressed. Likewise, testing with prototypes has successfully been 
> done
> since WGLC.
> 
> Neither WGLC feedback nor shepherd review did introduce any functional 
> changes to the
> protocol, but of course, the amount of restructuring and and editorial 
> improvements to the text
> is substantial, and this is why Mahesh asked us at IETF120 to check before 
> taking over.
> 
> Therefore i would like to give the WG a last opportunity to raise issues.
> If no substantial issues are raised, i will pass on the draft to our AD on 
> 08/23/2024 (end of next week).
> 
> Thank you so much to everybody who helped to create this work!
> 
> Toerless - for the chairs.
> 
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 04:20:05PM +0000, Fries, Steffen wrote:
> > Hi Sheng,
> > 
> > I will provide an updated version by tomorrow, incorporating the proposed 
> > changes. 
> > 
> > Best regards
> > Steffen
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sheng Jiang <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Montag, 20. Februar 2023 04:42
> > > To: anima <[email protected]>; Toerless Eckert <[email protected]>; anima-chairs
> > > <[email protected]>; draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm 
> > > <draft-ietf-anima-brski-
> > > [email protected]>; ietf <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: ietf <[email protected]>
> > > Subject: Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-06, ends Feb. 15th, 2023
> > > 
> > > During the WGLC period, this drafts has received no objections, but 
> > > comments.
> > > Therefore, the chairs would draw on a passed conclusion . The WG 
> > > discussed the
> > > authors' suggestion that move the YANG components of this to rfc8366bis 
> > > and
> > > reach the consensus to respect the authors' choice. The authors please 
> > > submit
> > > an update version. Then, the document shepherd can move it forward.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --------------
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Sheng Jiang
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >Dear ANIMAers,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >This message starts the two-week (*) ANIMA Working Group Last Call to
> > > advance draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm-06, which specifies enhancements to 
> > > BRSKI
> > > (RFC8995) to facilitate bootstrapping in domains featuring no or only time
> > > limited connectivity between a&nbsp;pledge and the domain registrar. This
> > > document's intended status is Standards Track. At present, there is no 
> > > IPR filed
> > > against this document. This document has been ANIMA WG document since
> > > October, 2021 and has received a lot of feedback from the WG and work from
> > > its authors. The authors therefore think is ready for WGLC. Please send 
> > > your
> > > comments by Feb. 15th 2023. If you do not feel this document should 
> > > advance,
> > > please state your reasons why.&nbsp;Matthias Kovatsch&nbsp;is the assgined
> > > document shepherd.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >Regards,&nbsp;
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >Sheng
> > > 
> 

-- 
---
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to