Laurent Toutain <[email protected]> wrote:
    > I'm a little bit confused with the references, the IANA page has a
    > reference for draft 12

Yes, there is an early allocation of the SID range to a previous version of
the document.   The experts are being asked if that's "still okay", I think.

    > 2450 50 ietf-voucher (TEMPORARY - registered 2024-07-15, publication
    > requested 2026-01-31) [draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-12
    > <https://www.iana.org/go/draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-12>]
    > 2500 50 ietf-voucher-request (TEMPORARY - registered 2024-07-15,
    > publication requested 2026-01-31) [draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-12
    > <https://www.iana.org/go/draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis-12>]
    > and the current version of the draft is 31.

    > Laurent



    > On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 9:16 PM Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
    > wrote:

    >>
    >> David Dong via RT <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> > Hi Michael,
    >>
    >> > Thank you for the clarifications.
    >>
    >> > The YANG-SID Ranges were added as RFC 7120 early allocations (and
    >> still
    >> > are in the registry there), but the YANG-SID Modules themselves have
    >> > not been:
    >>
    >> Yes, I don't quite remember when we changed this around, but I did look 
at
    >> the registry to see that yeah, they were changed to early allocations.
    >> I keep hoping we'll slide in under the 2yr line :-)
    >>
    >> > Regarding the YANG SID files, we're not familiar with how to extract
    >> > these files and to perform any needed updates on them. Our
    >> > understanding and instructions, as per RFC 9595 Section 6.4.3, have
    >> > been that the designated experts will provide the files for us to
    >> post.
    >>
    >> The "normal" kramdown-rfc-extract-sourcecode, etc. should work.
    >> I hope the VELOCE process update will make this simpler and clearer soon.
    >>
    >> > We're also not sure when to post these SID files; our understanding
    >> > have been that we would post the SID files along with the YANG
    >> Modules
    >> > after the document has been published as an RFC, since we post YANG
    >> > Module files after the document has been published as an RFC, but
    >> we've
    >> > also asked for clarifications in our Last Call review sent earlier
    >> > today. This is the first time we're having to post SID files as well.
    >>
    >> :-)
    >> I think that they get posted at the same time as the YANG module.
    >>
    >> --
    >> Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
    >> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                      *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>

    > ----------------------------------------------------
    > Alternatives:

    > ----------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to