Laurent Toutain <[email protected]> wrote: > what is not clear to me is whether a different SID file was announced > earlier. From -12 I found
Yes, but the assignment is not stable until the document is approved.
> There is some differences 2451 is now /ietf-voucher:voucher, 2463 was
> additional-configuration
> and becomes additional-configuration-url and est-domain changed from 2466
> to 2464
> 2501 data /ietf-voucher-request:voucher/voucher
We have a script that elides the left-hand side (common prefix) rather than
run into the 72 column limit and lose the useful suffix info.
> | 2501 | /ietf-voucher-request:voucher
> It looks pretty much the same except that the voucher level has been
> removed.
yes, there are changes to the xpath that pyang will generate.
> If the -12 has not been officially published, I've no opposition to this
> new allocation.
An I-D is always a WIP, so it can't ever be officially published.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
** My working hours and your working hours may be different. **
** Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours **
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
