So no objection from my side On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 5:26 PM Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Laurent Toutain <[email protected]> wrote: > > what is not clear to me is whether a different SID file was announced > > earlier. From -12 I found > > Yes, but the assignment is not stable until the document is approved. > > > There is some differences 2451 is now /ietf-voucher:voucher, 2463 was > > additional-configuration > > and becomes additional-configuration-url and est-domain changed > from 2466 > > to 2464 > > > 2501 data /ietf-voucher-request:voucher/voucher > > We have a script that elides the left-hand side (common prefix) rather than > run into the 72 column limit and lose the useful suffix info. > > > | 2501 | /ietf-voucher-request:voucher > > > It looks pretty much the same except that the voucher level has been > > removed. > > yes, there are changes to the xpath that pyang will generate. > > > If the -12 has not been officially published, I've no opposition to > this > > new allocation. > > An I-D is always a WIP, so it can't ever be officially published. > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > ** My working hours and your working hours may be different. > ** > ** Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours > ** > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
