<snipped a big part I mostly agreed with /> Ceki G�lc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We also need a whole body of supporting guideline documents > (legislation). This is on its way. The voting rules have been clarified and other guidelines will follow. > ps: On a related note, I don't think this discussion should be held > on the ant-dev list. Shouldn't there be a list for project wide > (Jakarta) discussions? You're looking for [email protected] 8-) This discussion is just a side effect of of a thread that was very Ant specific. And yes, the question whether there is a "Jakarta community" or not cannot be answered by the Ant community (alone). But if the majority of the Ant community decided to leave the Jakarta project, this would probably indicate there was no "Jakarta community" - only a "Server community", a "Library community", a "Devtools community" or even only "Tomcat community", "log4j community", "Ant community". Stefan
