Ceki G�lc� wrote: > > ps: On a related note, I don't think this discussion should be > held on the ant-dev list. Shouldn't there be a list for > project wide (Jakarta) discussions?
There is a list for project wide (Jakarta) discussions - it is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Feel free to copy that list and attach any or all of this there. I have a number of specific reasons why I wanted to initiate a discussion to be followed up by a vote by the Ant community. The original charter for Jakarta was for Tomcat, and Ant is the project that is simultaneously most out of scope, most likely to be self-sustaining, and had a recent crisis of sorts concerning the scope of the PMC versus the wishes of the majority of committers. If despite all of this, the wishes of the majority of the committers of this project wish to remain as a part of Jakarta, then my job of getting approval for an expanded scope is considerably simpler. - Sam Ruby
